Corporate Profile
Corporate Overview
Corporate Profile
Committee Charting
Governance Documents
Officers & Directors
News & Webcasts
Press Releases
Event Calendar
Presentations
Webcasts
SEC Filings
Documents
Annual Reports
Insider Filings
Insider Transactions
Institutional Ownership
Corporate Social Responsibility
2023 CSR Report
Documents
Policies
2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Stock Information
Stock Quote
Historic Prices
Financial Calculators
Financial Information
Peer Analysis
As Reported Financials
As Reported Financial Statements
As Reported Charting
Other Information
Information Request
Email Notification
Tax Information – IRS Form 8937
Analyst Coverage
IR Site Map
Skip to content
Close
Home
Careers
About
Locations
Bank Home
Menu
888.388.5433
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
IR Menu
Annual Reports
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.
Notify me of new financial documents posted to this site.
Click the link to the right to download:
Adobe Acrobat
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.